Definition for a hobbit.
I have read that English writer J.R.R. Tolkien was fascinated with the Welsh language and customs, to the point that he designed his fictional Elf language on Welsh meanings, words, and traditions. When Wales became part of the United Kingdom in 1707 (after a long and difficult transition), that did not mean that the Welsh people got in line and did what they were told to do. In particular, very independent Welsh language and culture endures today, and this is not just OK, cultural identity, once put down as rebellion, is now encouraged in all members of the United Kingdom.
Tolkien said that he worked on “The Hobbit” manuscript for 2.5 years, intending the story to be a fairy tale for adults to read to children. Indeed, his creation of a “halfling” relative of mankind resulted in child-sized adults who had physical features that seemed to belong on full-sized humans (large feet, noses, ears, and sometimes hands). In that, he walked a fine line as a writer. The hobbits, in appearance and in their simple ways were intended to amuse children, and possibly enable their parents to explain the importance of accepting and loving people who look different. Still, some prejudices against little people crept into Tolkien’s hobbit adventures when both humans and other humanoids (elves, dwarves, orks, etc.) considered hobbits to be unwise, uncommitted, and that they generally did not matter. Even Bilbo Baggins wrote down such observations about his own kind in his book.
I have read that Tolkien placed his horrifying experiences as
How did an intended children’s story become a series of violent tales of war?
a British soldier in WWI into the stories. I don’t see that. He began writing The Hobbit 12 years after WWI ended and before WWII began. My theory is that The Hobbit had to contain action and tales of human misery in order to appeal to adults. After all, the adults who would purchase the book would see that it contained way too much detail for children to comprehend or to sit still and have it read to them. The horror in the book seemed to work for those who read it (Many adults could not sit still to read it either). But, there was a low hum of public interest in the story that Tolkien wrote, a measure of its success through constant badgering that Tolkien endured, driving him to continue the tale in one or more additional books.
As Tolkien revived The Hobbit, the story evolved into the darker “Lord of the Rings” series. A fiction writer typically begins with a theme, then adds a setting and characters to bring the theme alive. It is the plot that intrigues the reader, and good writers obscure the plot or even hide it, so that the story unfolds in an unpredictable way. This is how the reader is kept interested, on edge, forced to imagine where the story is going, because the author did not give the answer early in the book. Tolkien gave away the plot early in “The Lord of the Rings.” The entire story was about another hobbit who agreed to save “Middle Earth” by agreeing to toss a ring into lava. But, remember that Tolkien thrived on creating details. By revealing the plot, he permitted himself to explain the entire made up history of walking talking trees, ruined elves, wizards that arise from death, dwarves that mine armored clothing, etc. He also empowered himself to breath life into many characters in the series.
As characters act out their roles, something unexplainable happens that only another writer can appreciate it. The characters tend to take on a life of their own, and it is they, acting within their character, who wrestle with the author about what they will do next. They will “attempt” to take the story to a conclusion different from the one the author intended. A disciplined writer reigns them in. An author will rewrite a nearly finished work of fiction if he or she realizes that the story has unfolded untrue to the plot. But, how could undisciplined characters ruin a plot that simply requires a ring to be tossed into lava?togel hari ini They can’t. Problem solved.I think that writing gave Tolkien, the aging war veteran and professor, another world in which to take his mind.
Fantasy writing simply interested him.
Editing what he wrote did not interest him (Note: Author James Michener also abstained editing). This is why his books are so voluminous (door stop size). They contain expansive pages of details about languages and other trivia that can put insomniacs to sleep. He had trouble with book publishers, many of whom believed the story would not sell. Indeed, Tolkien’s books did not become wildly successful until after his death in 2001 and much later, when Barrie M. Osborne produced, and Peter Jackson directed the film version of the books.
It was the films that turned the stories into bloody nightmarish war that should terrify children. Even the diminutive and innocent hobbits were turned into killers – War Hobbits. Why? People will pay money to watch that stuff, just like the Roman people did to watch blood-letting in the arena. Do you think Tolkien would care about that? I have no idea how he would feel about it. I do think he accomplished his personal mission with the stories. He wrote them to have something to do with his wandering mind. Once he got tired of it, a hobbit dropped a ring into lava.
Find Tony’s published novels online at
See and comment on a novel being written with blog posts at Tony’s Website and B
Participate in the writing of Tony’s 5th novel as a series of blog posts at